Worthy v. Brown
| Hasan Worthy |
| Acting Warden S. Brown |
| 5:2022cv00161 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 Clerk's Judgment, #9 Order Dismissing Case. Per USPS website SERVICE ACCEPTED on 7/28/2022. (ag) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 7/25/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/25/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION: the #1 petition in this case is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE this matter from the active docket of this Court and to enter judgment in favor of the respondents. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 7/25/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Main Document 9 replaced on 7/25/2022 to attach correct document) (nmm). Modified on 7/25/2022 (nmm). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/25/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003014 (nmm) |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/29/22. (lmm) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/30/22 per USPS. (lmm) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 petitioners Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; the petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee within 21 days of service of this order. Failure to comply with this Order will result in this matter being dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 6/28/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 4 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/27/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Hasan Worthy. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Hasan Worthy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against S. Brown, filed by Hasan Worthy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Worthy v. Brown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Hasan Worthy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Acting Warden S. Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
