Hannah v. Jones et al
Antonio Lasalle Hannah |
Shannon Jones, Jason Wharton, Brittney Harris and Kyle Moore |
5:2022cv00207 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OBJECTION TO #12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT, by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 17 RETURN RECEIPT as to #12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT and #13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/19/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 16 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 ORDER. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/15/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 14 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/12/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court on 9/14/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT: the #1 Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of the defendants and STRIKE this matter from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 9/14/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 11 ORDER: #2 plaintiff's Application and Affidavit to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/12/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to Trustee Clerk w/Consent via us mail; copy to Fin. Deputy via email) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #8 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL as to Antonio Lasalle Hannah. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/9/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 8 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court and #6 Notice of Deficient Pleading. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/29/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING re #3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 5 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Ledger sheet not provided) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 1 STATE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - document re:parental rights terminated involuntarily; aggravated circumstances, #2 Exhibit 2 - document re: falsified report, #3 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.