Hannah v. Jones et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Lasalle Hannah
Defendant: Shannon Jones, Jason Wharton, Brittney Harris and Kyle Moore
Case Number: 5:2022cv00207
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Filing 18 OBJECTION TO #12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT, by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm)
September 27, 2022 Filing 17 RETURN RECEIPT as to #12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT and #13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/19/2022. (nmm)
September 20, 2022 Filing 16 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 ORDER. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/15/2022. (nmm)
September 15, 2022 Filing 14 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/12/2022. (nmm)
September 14, 2022 Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court on 9/14/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING 42 U.S.C. 1983 COMPLAINT: the #1 Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of the defendants and STRIKE this matter from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 9/14/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: #2 plaintiff's Application and Affidavit to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/12/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to Trustee Clerk w/Consent via us mail; copy to Fin. Deputy via email) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #8 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL as to Antonio Lasalle Hannah. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/9/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
September 8, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(nmm)
September 1, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court and #6 Notice of Deficient Pleading. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/29/2022. (nmm)
August 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING re #3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
August 26, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
August 26, 2022 Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm)
August 26, 2022 Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Ledger sheet not provided) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 STATE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Antonio Lasalle Hannah. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - document re:parental rights terminated involuntarily; aggravated circumstances, #2 Exhibit 2 - document re: falsified report, #3 Envelope)(nmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hannah v. Jones et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Lasalle Hannah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shannon Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Wharton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brittney Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?