Eakle v. Tibbs et al
| David Eakle |
| Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and Superintendent Joseph Wood |
| 5:2022cv00219 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Eakle. Shannon Sams waiver sent on 10/18/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Nash, Lesley) (Main Document 7 replaced on 11/4/2022 to attach non-fillable pdf document) (nmm). Modified on 11/4/2022; NEF Regenerated (nmm).
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Eakle. Joseph Wood waiver sent on 10/18/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Nash, Lesley) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/4/2022 to attach non-fillable pdf document) (nmm). Modified on 11/4/2022; NEF Regenerated (nmm).
|
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint to Extend Answer Date by Michael Costello, Timothy Tibbs. (Parsons, Colton)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Eakle. Michael Costello waiver sent on 10/18/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Nash, Lesley)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Eakle. Timothy Tibbs waiver sent on 10/18/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Nash, Lesley)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Eakle. Filing Fee PAID $402 - Receipt #AWVNDC-3547930. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
