Green v. Chief of Police Wheeling Police Department et al
| Julian Lee Green |
| Chief of Police Wheeling Police Department, Officer B. Hoehn and Officer C. Castilow |
| 5:2022cv00226 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/4/22. (lmm) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 9/28/2022. (ag)(pro se PLA cm rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag).
|
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/19/22. (lmm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Plaintiff via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/16/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Julian Lee Green. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Julian Lee Green. (Attachments: #1 Wheeling PD Narrative, #2 Criminal Judgment Order, #3 Envelope) (exhibit sealed per J. Bailey)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
