Parker v. Bayless
Ruffin L. Parker |
N. Bayless |
5:2022cv00227 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/8/22. (lmm) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #9 RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: It is accordingly ORDERED that the Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the petition on or before December 15, 2022. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/4/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Petition by N. Bayless. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/20/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED: the Warden shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/18/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr; copy to ausa via us mail and cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003081 (nmm) |
Filing 5 LETTER from Ruffin Parker to Clerk advising FCI Morgantown Trust Funds System is down and payment will be made ASAP when Trust Funds System is back up and running. (Attachments: #1 Verification of Incarceration from BOP, #2 Copy of Notice of Deficient Pleading sent, #3 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court and #3 Notice of Deficient Pleading. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/26/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 2241 Packet) (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/19/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 2 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/19/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against N. Bayless, filed by Ruffin L. Parker. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy Docs, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parker v. Bayless | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ruffin L. Parker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: N. Bayless | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Prezioso |
Represented By: | Erin K. Reisenweber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.