Hammons v. Lovett et al
| Britt Jarriel Hammons |
| S. Lovett and S. Brown |
| 5:2022cv00244 |
| October 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/14/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
|
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003086 (lmm) |
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice #4 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/11/22. (lmm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Attach. B & C of 2241 Form) (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Change of Address by Britt Jarriel Hammons. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (no updated needed) (lmm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against S. Brown, S. Lovett, filed by Britt Jarriel Hammons. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
