Walker v. Bayless
Petitioner: Timothy E. Walker
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Case Number: 5:2022cv00246
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2022 Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/22/22. (lmm)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION re #10 Motion for Extension of Time: respondent is instructed to file a responsive pleading or motion on or before December 14, 2022. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/18/2022. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
November 18, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Petition by M.J. Bayless. (Palmer, Jordan)
November 17, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Vincent Palmer on behalf of M.J. Bayless (Palmer, Jordan)
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/28/22 per USPS. (lmm)
October 26, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION REQUESTING #1 PETITION BE TREATED AS AN EMERGENCY filed by Timothy E. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/26/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr; AUSA via US Mail) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 24, 2022 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003093 (nmm)
October 13, 2022 Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/11/22. (lmm)
October 7, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Attac. B & C of 2241 Form) (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 7, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 7, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against M.J. Bayless, filed by Timothy E. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Computation Date, #2 Exhibit B - Inmate Request, #3 Exhibit C - Resolution Form, #4 Exhibit D - Administrative Remedy, #5 Exhibit E - Administrative Remedy, #6 Exhibit F - Administrative Remedy, #7 Exhibit G - Remedy Appeal, #8 Envelope) (exhibit A sealed per J. Bailey)(lmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Bayless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy E. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Represented By: Christopher James Prezioso
Represented By: Jordan Vincent Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?