Borelli v. Nunley Warden
Petitioner: Mr. Henry Joseph Borelli
Respondent: Mr. Nunley Warden
Case Number: 5:2022cv00254
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2022 Filing 15 RULE 42(b) MANDATE of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Henry Joseph Borelli. This court's order dismissing this appeal pursuant to Local Rule 42(b) takes effect today. (lmm)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Henry Joseph Borelli (lmm)
November 29, 2022 Filing 13 COURTESY COPY OF LETTER from Petitioner re #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Henry Joseph Borelli. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (letter emailed to USCA per USCA) (lmm)
November 21, 2022 Filing 12 Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit re #7 Notice of Appeal. (lmm)
November 21, 2022 Filing 11 USCA Records Request as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Henry Joseph Borelli (lmm)
November 21, 2022 Filing 10 USCA NOTICE OF APPELLATE CASE OPENING: re #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Henry Joseph Borelli. USCA USCA Case Number: 22-7338. Case Manager: Karen Stump 804-916-2704. (lmm)
November 18, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/10/2022. (nmm)
November 16, 2022 Filing 8 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal (lmm)
November 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order Dismissing Case by Henry Joseph Borelli. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/7/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr)(lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/26/22. (lmm)
October 25, 2022 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNW003095 (lmm)
October 24, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Attach. B & C of 2241 Form) (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 24, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. ( Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
October 24, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Nunley Warden, filed by Henry Joseph Borelli. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borelli v. Nunley Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mr. Henry Joseph Borelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr. Nunley Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?