Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
| David Moore |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 5:2022cv00258 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Michael John Aloi |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by David Moore of Filing Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendant (Cardi, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Goetz. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/5/22. (lmm)
|
| Filing 6 PHV Filing fee for Attorney Goetz: $ 200.00, receipt number WVNW003109 (lmm) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David B. Goetz by David Moore. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Cardi, Michael) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT. The Clerk of the Court shall issue the summons and send to the attorney of record, who shall serve the summons and Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 10/31/22. (lmm)
|
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Moore. (lmm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by David Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
