Newell v. Tate et al
| Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. |
| DiDymus Tate, Prime Care Health Service, Lt. Martin, OFC. Booth, OFC. Gill and OFC. Henry |
| 5:2022cv00277 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RETURN RECEIPT as to #13 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/17/23 per USPS. (lmm) |
| Filing 14 Initial Partial Filing fee: $ 22.78; Additional Partial Filing Fee: $11.99, receipt number WVNE018507 (nmm) |
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: the plaintiff will show cause within fourteen (14) days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 1/12/2023. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to Fin. Deputy and Trustee Clerk w/ Consent to Collection) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/12/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 12 LETTER from Leroy L. Newell, Jr. to Litigation Clerk re: upcoming parole and transfers involved with this process. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE MAILING ADDRESS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/19/2022 (per usps website). (nmm) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE MAILING ADDRESS re: #9 Letter Motion filed by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/15/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION requesting copy of #6 Notice of General Guidelines be sent to residential address, by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 copy of postal receipt, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/9/2022 (per usps website). (nmm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #2 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES: an initial partial filing fee of $22.78 is due. Failure to pay the initial filing fee within twenty-eight (28) days of the entry of this Order, will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 12/6/2022. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to F. Deputy & Trustee Clerk w/Consent to Collection) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 6 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr (address updated in cm/ecf) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 WVDCR Resident Average Balance Statement, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 1 STATE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Leroy Lee Newell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
