Black v. Rey et al
Randy L. Black |
Warden Rey, Unknown Doctor and Health Service Staff and Bureau of Prisons |
5:2023cv00107 |
March 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 5/5/23. (lmm) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE: it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE this action from the active docket of this Court; the pending #4 Question of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 5/2/2023. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/2/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 4 QUESTION OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Randy L. Black. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 3/24/2023. (nmm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Bivens Packet) (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Randy L. Black. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.