Moser v. Ray
| Connie Su Moser |
| Warden Ray |
| 5:2023cv00145 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading is GRANTED. Respondent shall file an answer or otherwise respond to petitioners Petition on or before June 28, 2023. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 6/13/2023. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/13/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden Ray. (Palmer, Jordan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Vincent Palmer on behalf of Warden Ray (Palmer, Jordan) |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 5/19/2023 (per usps website). (nmm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED: the Warden shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Attorney Christopher James Prezioso added for Warden Ray. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 5/17/2023. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr; copy to ausa via us mail and cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNC003694 (nmm) |
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court and #3 Notice of Deficient Pleading. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 4/19/2023. (nmm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 2241 Packet) (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/17/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 2 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/17/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Warden Ray, filed by Connie Su Moser. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy docs, #2 Page 2 of 9, Document #11 from Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-57 re: Material Facts, #3 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moser v. Ray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Connie Su Moser | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Ray | |
| Represented By: | Christopher James Prezioso |
| Represented By: | Jordan Vincent Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
