Damron v. FCI Hazelton Staff
| Jonathon Damron |
| FCI Hazelton Staff |
| 5:2023cv00165 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 5/22/2023 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS: plaintiff refiled his Complaint on the court-approved form, and it was assigned Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-128. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Notice, the Court ORDERS that this action is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE this matter from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 5/18/2023. (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 5/4/23 per USPS. (lmm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS (Attachments: #1 Bivens Packet) (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/2/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of West Virginia Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-00344. (nmm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE This matter is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Clarksburg Division, for further consideration. Plaintiff is advised that this matter will be assigned a new case number and will be assigned a new judicial officer by the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 5/2/2023. (cc: Plaintiff) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 5/2/2023.]
|
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 5/2/2023.] |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 5/2/2023.] |
| Filing 1 LETTER-FORM COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 5/2/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Damron v. FCI Hazelton Staff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathon Damron | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FCI Hazelton Staff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
