Seldon v. Brown
Damon Seldon |
R. Brown |
5:2023cv00287 |
August 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 ORDER AND ROSEBORO NOTICE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/13/2023 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 11 ORDER AND ROSEBORO NOTICE re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by R. Brown. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/11/2023. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment by R. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Attachment A, #3 Attachment B, #4 Attachment C)(Nogay, Maximillian) |
Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/15/2023. (nmm) |
Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED: the Warden shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/12/2023. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr; copy to ausa via cm/ecf and us mail) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT and #5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/1/2023 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100003727 (nmm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Damon Seldon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damon Seldon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit to Pay Fees, #2 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against R. Brown, filed by Damon Seldon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2023: #2 Certificates) (lmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Seldon v. Brown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Damon Seldon | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: R. Brown | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Prezioso |
Represented By: | Maximillian F. Nogay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.