Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown et al
| Efrain Ortiz-Vargas |
| Warden Brown and Director of BOP C. Peters |
| 5:2023cv00306 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order Dismissing Case,. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/18/23 per USPS. (lmm) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court notes that petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee in this case; accordingly, the Clerk is directed to apply the filing fee to Civil Action Number 5:23-CV-318. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/16/23. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
|
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/2/23 per USPS. (lmm) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100003743 (lmm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 2241 Form) (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Brown, C. Peters, filed by Efrain Ortiz-Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Resolution Form, #2 Program Guide, #3 Envelope)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
