Terrell v. Lovette
Brooks Terrell |
Warden Lovette |
5:2023cv00369 |
December 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RETURN RECEIPT as to #12 Order Dismissing Case. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 2/16/2024. (ag) |
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE this action from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 2/14/24. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2024: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/31/2024. (nmm) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS: petitioner's #6 Motion for Summary Judgment and #7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/29/2024. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/29/2024: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 ORDER. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/4/2024 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 ORDER. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/8/2024. (nmm) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), by Brooks Terrell. (Attachments: #1 Incident Report, #2 Cover letter to Clerk, #3 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Brooks Terrell. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter to Clerk, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 5 ORDER: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; the petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee within 21 days of service of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 1/4/2024. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/4/2024: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 4 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brooks Terrell. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brooks Terrell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Warden Lovette, filed by Brooks Terrell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Terrell v. Lovette | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Brooks Terrell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Lovette | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.