Aguon v. Hazelton F.C.I. Warden et al
| Robert L. Aguon |
| Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S. and The O.I.G. |
| 5:2024cv00035 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 4/16/2024. (nmm) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE this action from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 4/11/24. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/11/2024: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
|
| Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 2/28/2024. (nmm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS (Attachments: #1 2241 Packet) (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/26/2024: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S., The O.I.G., filed by Robert L. Aguon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope)(nmm) Modified on 2/26/2024 to delete attach # 4, cm,rrr as it was inadvertently added to the wrong entry (nmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
