Tucker v. Grope et al
| Ronald Tucker |
| Richard L. Grope, Western Reserve Orthotics & Prosthetics Centre, Inc. and Kimberly L. Grope |
| 5:2024cv00191 |
| September 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 10/24/2024; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/7/2024; Discovery due by 11/21/2024. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 9/26/2024. (ag)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Ohio County, WV, (case number 24-C-155), filed by Kimberly L. Grope, Richard L. Grope, Western Reserve Orthotics & Prosthetics Centre, Inc..Filing Fee $405. Receipt #AWVNDC-4019098. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Plaintiffs Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit B Grope Affidavit, #3 Exhibit C Ohio Secretary of State Business Details, #4 Exhibit D A Copy of Docket Sheet, #5 Criminal Cover Sheet)(ag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
