Hayes v. Marshall et al
Plaintiff: Lloyd Hayes
Defendant: William K. Marshall, III, Jamie Gray, Nurse Practitioner Lacey and C.O. Morgan
Case Number: 5:2024cv00219
Filed: November 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 1983 Packet)(copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/26/2024: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
November 26, 2024 Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of West Virginia Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-00592. (nmm)
November 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE The Clerk is directed to transfer this matter and Plaintiff's file to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Wheeling Division, for further consideration. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 11/26/2024. (cc: Plaintiff) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
November 15, 2024 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDED COMPLAINT by Lloyd Hayes against Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Nurse Practitioner Lacey, Nurse Practitioner Morgan, Medical Director Jamie Gray (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
November 15, 2024 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Lloyd Hayes against Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Nurse Practitioner Lacey, Nurse Practitioner Morgan, Medical Director Jamie Gray (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER To the extent Plaintiff wishes to pursue claims concerning incidents occurring at Northern Correctional Center, Plaintiff should initiate an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his Section 1983 claim, he should amend his #2 Complaint to name individual defendants and state specific facts as to how each defendant violated his constitutional rights. The Amended Complaint will supersede the initial #2 Complaint. Plaintiff is notified that if he wishes to fully exhaust his administrative remedies prior to seeking relief, he should voluntarily dismiss this action and initiate a new action upon completion of the administrative remedy process. Plaintiff has until 11/22/2024 to amend his Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/22/2024. (cc: Plaintiff w/form Complaint) (arb) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 21, 2024 CASE REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition pursuant to #3 Standing Order. (ts) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 21, 2024 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 21, 2024 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED SEPTEMBER 1, 2024. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (lca) (Modified on 10/24/2024 to switch referral role for magistrate) (ts). [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 21, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits in Support, #2 Envelope) (lca) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]
October 21, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION by Lloyd Hayes to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (Attachment: #1 Resident Transaction Details) (lca) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 11/26/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. Marshall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William K. Marshall, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamie Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Practitioner Lacey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.O. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lloyd Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?