Merrill v. Agnesian Healthcare
Plaintiff: James E Merrill, DO
Defendant: Agnesian Healthcare Inc
Case Number: 1:2007cv00938
Filed: October 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Green Bay Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 DECISION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment AND finding as moot 39 Motion for Leave to File, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 02-23-2009. The Clerk is instructed to place this matter on the calendar for further proceedings. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merrill v. Agnesian Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James E Merrill, DO
Represented By: George Burnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Agnesian Healthcare Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?