DISA Industries A/S v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc
Plaintiff: DISA Industries A/S
Defendant: Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc
Case Number: 1:2007cv00949
Filed: October 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Green Bay Office
County: Waupaca
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 09-28-2009, denied as moot 84 Sealed Motion; denied as moot 91 Sealed Motion; denied as moot 102 Motion for Order; denied as moot 103 Motion for Summary Judgment; denied as moot 114 Motion for R econsideration; denied as moot 118 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 134 Motion to Withdraw Motion; granting 135 Motion to Vacate. The motion to vacate is GRANTED, and this Courts decision (Dkt. # 100) is VACATED. The consent motion to withdraw the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 103) is also GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot, and the case will be administratively closed. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
April 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 100 VACATED (SEE 136 Order entered 9/28/2009) - DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING 54 Waupaca's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; GRANTING 65 Motion to Amend Answer; GRANTING 69 Motion to Amend Expert Report; GRANTING 89 96 Motions to Seal; the protective order allows the documents to be sealed, and thus no further motions to seal are required, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on April 7, 2009. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) Modified on 9/29/2009 (tlf).
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER granting 74 Motion to File sealed exhibits; granting 76 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 79 Motion to Seal Document. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER denying 64 Motion to Compel, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 01-21-2009. If, upon receipt of the Defendants responses, Plaintiff believes they are inadequate, it may renew its motion to compel. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
January 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER DENYING 52 Motion for Reconsideration and DENYING AS MOOT 60 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 1-05-2009. See Order Denying Reconsideration for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DISA Industries A/S v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DISA Industries A/S
Represented By: Brian C Riopelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?