Dental Health Products Inc v. Ringo
| Dental Health Products Inc |
| Frank Ringo |
| 1:2008cv01039 |
| December 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Brown |
| William C Griesbach |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 18:1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 10/03/2011. Plaintiff is directed to inform the Court on or before October 14, 2011 whether it wishes to dismiss claims against Cornejo. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Frank Ringo)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
172
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Plaintiff is entitled to judgment awarding it $198,427.02 for breach of the duty of loyalty. It is further awarded damages of $15,865.88 for Ringos violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to judgment awarding punitive damages in the amount of $100,000. Defendants counterclaims are dismissed. The motions in limine are denied as moot. Claims against Defendant DESI are dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff DHPI and against Defendant Frank Ringo in the total amount of $314,292.90 together with costs. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
155
DECISION AND ORDER denying 104 Motion to Compel and denying 104 Motion for Sanctions; granting 106 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting 113 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 08/24/2011. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Frank Ringo) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 5-28-10 denying 57 Motion to Strike. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING 73 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on April 1, 2010. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER GRANTING 65 7.4 MOTION to Modify Scheduilng Order filed by Dental Health Products Inc., signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 03/15/2010. Discovery will now close on June 21; dispositive motions are due July 1. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 01/05/2010. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 9 motions. The clerk is directed to set this matter on the Court's calendar for a Rule 16 scheduling conference, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on April 20, 2009 (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dental Health Products Inc v. Ringo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dental Health Products Inc | |
| Represented By: | Bruce A Olson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frank Ringo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
