1st Rate Mortgage Corporation et al v. Vision Mortgage Services Corporation et al
| 1st Rate Mortgage Corporation and William T Thayse |
| Vision Mortgage Services Corporation, Richard S Robokoff, Ronald E Hugo, Christine A Skaleski, Kristen L Kristen and Heather E VanStraten |
| 1:2009cv00471 |
| May 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Brown |
| William C Griesbach |
| Plaintiff |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting 80 Motion in Limine. If either party wished to provide additional authority on the issue, they should do so on or before January 5, 2012. Signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 12/20/2011. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Ronald Hugo, Christine Skaleski, Kristen Kirsten, Heather VanStraten) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 91 Motion for Reconsideration; signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 11/22/2011. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Ronald Hugo) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
65
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 - 40 Motions for Summary Judgment; claims two, eight and ten are DISMISSED. In all other respects, the motions are DENIED. The clerk is directed to place the case on for a scheduling conference. Signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/14/2011 (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
