Miller v. Schmitz et al
| Ronald L Miller |
| Michael Schmitz, Kevin Hurst, CO Duffy, CO Clayton, Nurse Carrie and Unknown |
| 1:2010cv00300 |
| April 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Dodge |
| William C Griesbach |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by granting 47 Motion to Dismiss; signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 4/01/2011. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Ronald Miller) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Compel, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 01/10/2011. Plaintiff is directed to sign the release without restriction and return it to the defendants on or before February 1, 2011. Any further delay in this matter will result in dismissal of his lawsuit. (cc: all counsel by efile and plaintiff by U.S. Mail) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 12/15/2010. Plaintiff is to either sign the medical authorizations or advise the Court of the reason for his refusal on or before 01/03/2011. Defendants may supplement their Motion for Summary Judgment 32 by 2/15/2011. Plaintiff's response due 3/15/2011. Defendants' reply due 4/14/2011. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Ronald Miller)(Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
