GreenStone Farm Credit Services ACA et al v. Ort et al
GreenStone Farm Credit Services ACA and GreenStone Farm Credit Services FLCA |
Cynthia L Ort, Kari Ort-Bunting and Gary L Ort |
1:2010cv01175 |
December 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Green Bay Office |
Outagamie |
William C Griesbach |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 ORDER on the issue of damages regarding 80 Order for Default Judgment and Imposing Sanctions following 120 Order for additional briefing after 117 Hearing. The Court finds that Defendant Gary Ort diverted some $6,004,998 in loans from Plaintiff and this amount constitutes a fraudulent transfer at the expense of the creditor, Greenstone. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 120 ORDER re 117 Minute Order on Motion to Compel directing the parties to submit further briefing on the issues outlined in this order, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 08/02/2012. Plaintiff is directed to file, by August 10, a short brief addressing the concerns outlined. Defendant Ort may file a response by August 17. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel by efile; Ort via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 115 ORDER granting 109 Motion to Quash, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 07/19/2012. The Court grants the motion to quash the subpoenas conditionally upon the pro se defendant failing to provide just reason for the late notice of the depositions or a challenge to the allegation that he has failed to provide witness and mileage fees. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 80 ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 3/9/2012. Plaintiffs' 52 Motion to Compel is granted as to Gary Ort and denied as to Cynthia Ort. Defendant Gary Ort's 14 Answer is stricken and default judgment will be entered against him as to all claims in the original 1 Complaint, with the amount of damages to be determined. Gary Ort is ordered to comply with Plaintiffs' outstanding discovery requests; failure to do so may result in further sanctions. The clerk is directed to set a telephone conference to address further scheduling. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 75 ORDER granting 56 Motion to Compel as to Tim Flaherty and Northern Premium Hardwoods, LLC AND granting 58 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 03/05/2012. No bond is required for entry of the preliminary inju nction in that the Court finds that NPH is free to use the equipment and other property while the injunction is pending and should therefore suffer no loss or damage as a result of this injunction. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAIL. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 11/29/2011. Defendant Gary Ort shall have 10 days from the date of this Order in which to file any objection to the amount of fees requested. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 47 ORDER GRANTING 43 Motion to Compel; signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 11/22/2011. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 41 ORDER granting 39 Motion to Compel, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 10/12/2011. Defendant Ort is ordered to comply with Plaintiff's supplemental discovery requests within 10 days. Plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing this motion. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.