Norton v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc et al
| Don A Norton |
| O'Dess & Associates SC, Chad F Kowalewski and American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc |
| 1:2011cv00842 |
| September 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William C Griesbach |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Order, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 12/17/2012. Plaintiff will have fourteen days to respond to Defendants motion for summary judgment. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time allotted, I will decide Defendants motion for summary judgment on the record before the Court. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 22 Motion to extend Dispositive Motion Deadline to August 20, 2012; denying 26 Motion to file Amended Complaint without prejudice. The motion fails to comply with the local rules of the district which requires that a copy of the proposed new pleading be attached and an explanation of the changes and additions be provided in the motion itself. See Civil L.R. 15(b). (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 11/18/2011 granting 4 Motion to Dismiss. Chad F Kowalewski and O'Dess & Associates SC are dismissed as parties to this action. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
