Priority International Animal Concepts Inc v. Bryk et al
| Priority International Animal Concepts Inc |
| Charles Gleisner, Keith Lowe and John Bryk |
| Keith Lowe |
| Priority International Animal Concepts Inc |
| 1:2012cv00150 |
| February 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Manitowoc |
| William C Griesbach |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
DECISION AND ORDER denying 61 Motion to Dismiss; denying 64 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 12/01/2012. See Decision and Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss; signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 05/31/2012. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Gleisner's Motion for Partial Dismissal, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 05/18/2012. Prioritys claims under the Non-Compete Agreement are dismissed, as is its separate claim for injunctive relief. Its request for injunctive relief will remain in the complaint as part of the ad damnum clause or prayer for relief. In all other respects, the motion is denied. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
