Diedrich v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Lynnette Diedrich
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 1:2014cv00974
Filed: August 10, 2014
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Green Bay Office
County: Manitowoc
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 25, 2015 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REMANDING CASE signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 09/25/2015. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further consideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)(sentence four). (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diedrich v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynnette Diedrich
Represented By: David F Traver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By: Social Security Administration(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?