Berry v. Lutsey et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Berry
Defendant: Jean Lutsey, Mary Suavey, MD and Joanne LaBelle
Case Number: 1:2017cv00551
Filed: April 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Green Bay Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 8/28/18 denying 138 Motion for Order for Enforcement and denying 139 Motion for Order Compelling Defendants to Approve Legal Loan.. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Christopher Berry, Warden and PLRA Attorney USCA) (Griesbach, William)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 8/13/18 GRANTS Plaintiff's 135 Motion IN PART and directs the prison officials to pay the initial partial filing fee assessed by the Court out of the Plaintiff's release account, to the e xtent that funds in his regular account do not cover the entire amount. Thereafter, all payments will be made out of the plaintiff's regular account as directed in the Court's previous 133 order. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Christopher Berry, the Warden and the PLRA Attorney USCA 7th Circuit) (Griesbach, William)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C. Griesbach on 7/18/18. Defendants' 88 95 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. Berry's 111 motion to amend his proposed filings of fact is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendants. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Christopher Berry)(Griesbach, William)
June 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee; finding as moot 11 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 12 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 19 Motion to Amend Complaint. Defendants Allen, Joseph, Haight and the Special Needs Committee are dismissed. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Christopher Berry and Warden) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. Lutsey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jean Lutsey
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Suavey, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joanne LaBelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?