Hoskins v. Waukesha County Jail Administration et al
Michael S Hoskins |
Waukesha County Jail Administration, Wollenhaupt, Waukesha County Jail Health Service Manager and Lt Shallow |
1:2018cv00413 |
March 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Green Bay Office |
Dodge |
William C Griesbach |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 190 ORDER denying 189 Motion for Court Hearing. Hoskins will be allowed an additional twenty (20) days from the date of this order to file his response to the defendants motion. If Hoskins does file a response, the defendants will be allowed fifteen (15) days to reply. If no response is filed, the pending motions will be decided on the record as it now stands. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 175 ORDER denying without prejudice 146 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants are granted leave to refile within ten days. Denying 170 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 171 Motion for Extension of Time. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Hoskins) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 56 ORDER denying re 55 MOTION to File Amended Complaint filed by Michael S Hoskins, granting 54 MOTION filed by Michael S Hoskins, Officer Chamberlain added to case. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Hoskins and Officer in Charge)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 36 SCREENING ORDER. Nurse Zerbst is dismissed. The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint and this order upon Officer Holzhueter, Officer Buboltz, and Lieutenant Wild of the Waukesha County Sheriffs Department (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins and Warden )(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C. Griesbach on 7/31/18. The 31 MOTION for disqualification will therefore be DENIED. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael S. Hoskins)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 30 ORDER denying 28 Motion for Order for Help; denying 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 21 ORDER No answer is required at this time until and unless Plaintiff is able to identify the correctional officer who allegedly injured him. In the event that the Jail Administrator or Wollenhaupt chooses to answer and interpose an affirmative defense at this time, before the identity of the actual defendant is determined, they are free to do so. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 5/8/18 granting 13 Motion to correct date. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 4/25/2018. Defendants Lt Shallow and Waukesha County Jail Health Service Manager are dismissed from this action. The Waukesha Jail Administrator will remain as a defendant to facilitate identification of the John Doe defendant. The USMS is directed to serve defendant Waukesha County Jail Administrator. The WI DOC is directed to collect the balance of the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff may conduct limited discovery until 7/23/2018 to identify the John Doe defendant. (cc: Michael S Hoskins and Warden Brian Foster via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.