Uelmen v. Cherry Optical Inc
| Jolene Uelmen |
| Cherry Optical, Inc. and Cherry Optical Inc |
| 1:2018cv01265 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Brown |
| William C Griesbach |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cherry Optical Inc - Waiver sent on 8/16/2018. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Summons Issued as to Cherry Optical Inc. (mac) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jolene Uelmen. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of Jolene Uelmen. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Jolene Uelmen. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Cherry Optical, Inc. by Jolene Uelmen. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2899085) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Luzi, Scott) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
