Nagan v. Optio Solutions LLC
| Stacy Nagan |
| Optio Solutions LLC |
| 1:2019cv00170 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 4/17/2019 at 09:00 AM before Chief Judge William C Griesbach. The court will initiate the call. Counsel are to provide the telephone number at which they can be reached (direct dial preferred) at least two days prior to the telephone conference. In the event counsel are unavailable at the scheduled time of the telephone conference, the conference may be re-scheduled and counsel may be required to appear in person. Please provide your telephone number to the Office of the Clerk at wied_clerks_gb@wied.uscourts.gov (cc: all counsel)(mac) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE Statement by Optio Solutions LLC. (Little, Brendan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Optio Solutions LLC.(Little, Brendan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacy Nagan. Optio Solutions LLC served on 2/8/2019. (Thomasson, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Stacy Nagan (Thomasson, Andrew) |
| Summons Issued as to Optio Solutions LLC c/o Registered Agent. (lh) |
| Summons Issued as to Optio Solutions LLC. (mac) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Stacy Nagan. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Thomasson, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip D Stern on behalf of Stacy Nagan. Attorney(s) appearing: Philip D. Stern (Stern, Philip) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew T Thomasson on behalf of Stacy Nagan. Attorney(s) appearing: Andrew T. Thomasson (Thomasson, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Stacy Nagan. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-3023497) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greene, Francis) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nagan v. Optio Solutions LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy Nagan | |
| Represented By: | Philip D Stern |
| Represented By: | Andrew T Thomasson |
| Represented By: | Francis R Greene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Optio Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brendan H Little |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
