Ness v. Saul
Plaintiff: Paul J. Ness and Paul J Ness
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv00920
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Filing 10 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due 10/11/19; Defendant's response due 11/20/19; Plaintiff's reply due 12/5/19. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
July 9, 2019 Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 7/3/2019. (blr)
July 3, 2019 Filing 8 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/1/2019. (blr)
July 2, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Andrew M Saul Paul J Ness. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean) Modified on 7/2/2019 (blr).
June 25, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/25/19 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
June 25, 2019 Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
June 24, 2019 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Paul J. Ness. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald)
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Paul J. Ness. (Chewning, Donald)
June 24, 2019 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Paul J. Ness. (Chewning, Donald)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Paul J. Ness (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald)
June 24, 2019 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ness v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul J. Ness
Represented By: Donald J Chewning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul J Ness
Represented By: Donald J Chewning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Jean Marie Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?