Beck v. Social Security Administration
Tim James Beck |
Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv01228 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due 12/18/19; Defendant's response due 1/27/20; Plaintiff's reply due 2/11/20. (cc: all counsel) (jad) |
Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/4/2019. (blr) |
Filing 6 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/3/2019. (blr) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Social Security Administration. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Social Security Administration. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Transmit #1 Complaint and #3 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee PETITION and Affidavit to Proceed Without Prepayment of fees and/or costs filed by Tim James Beck. (Clowers, David) Modified on 8/23/2019 (blr). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Tim James Beck. (Clowers, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2019: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ds). |
NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #2 PETITION by Tim James Beck; The incorrect event was chosen. The correct event was Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. This document does not need to be re-filed. Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (blr) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Beck v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
Represented By: | Jean Marie Godfrey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tim James Beck | |
Represented By: | David R Clowers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.