Robinson v. Brooks
| Clifton Robinson |
| Dave Brooks |
| 1:2019cv01294 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 10/18/19. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Clifton Robinson)(lh) |
Filing 10
SCREENING ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 10/17/19. Plaintiff's #8 motion for leave to file amended complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff's #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court shall document this inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The clerk shall enter judgment. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Robinson and Warden)(Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Clifton Robinson (lh) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Dave Brooks filed by Clifton Robinson. (Attachments: #1 mot amend)(lh) |
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $9.42, receipt number GB4689-4689005524. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (lh) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Clifton Robinson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that within 21 days plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $9.42 as an initial partial filing fee in this action, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 9/10/2019. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to Plaintiff and Warden at GBCI)(Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER from the Clerk to Clifton Robinson regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Clifton Robinson re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mac) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Clifton Robinson. (mac) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Clifton Robinson. (mac) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Dave Brooks by Clifton Robinson. (mac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Brooks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clifton Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dave Brooks | |
| Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
