Sickinger v. Saul
Plaintiff: Tammy Sickinger
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv01489
Filed: October 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Referring Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2019 Filing 11 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 10/28/2019. (blr)
October 23, 2019 Filing 10 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due February 3, 2020; Defendant's response due March 15, 2020; Plaintiff's reply due April 1, 2020. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/23/2019 REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
October 23, 2019 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/22/2019. #6 Plaintiff's amended motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee GRANTED; #2 plaintiff's original motion DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
October 18, 2019 Filing 6 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Tammy Sickinger. (Duncan, Dana)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/16/2019. By 11/6/2019 plaintiff to file amended motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tammy Sickinger. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
October 10, 2019 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Tammy Sickinger. (Duncan, Dana)
October 10, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Tammy Sickinger. (Duncan, Dana)
October 10, 2019 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Tammy Sickinger (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
October 10, 2019 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sickinger v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Sickinger
Represented By: Dana W Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?