Hammersley v. Peterson et al
| Robert Edgar Hammersley |
| Deputy Fischer, Thomas Neuser, Judge Sue Bischel, Daniel Mitchell, Christopher Tappen, Dustan Peterson, Brown County Sheriff, Christopher Froelich, William Donarski, Cynthia L Vopal, Sgt Richard Kurth, Patrick Harding, John/Jane Doe, Jefren Olsen, Judge Kendall M Kelley, Dana Johnson, Kate R Zuidmulder, Judge Timothy A Hinkfuss and Holly Allen Vanderlinden |
| 1:2019cv01855 |
| December 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 USCA Case Number 20-1244 USCA re: #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (lh) |
| Filing 14 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
| Filing 13 Pro Se Cover Letter re: #10 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (mac) |
| Filing 11 Docketing Statement by Robert Edgar Hammersley re #10 Notice of Appeal (cc: all counsel) (mac) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (cc: all counsel) (mac) |
| Copy of Pro Se Cover Letter #13 , Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA #14 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert Hammersley with USCA forms (mac) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 1/16/20 denying #7 Motion for Reconsideration; denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and denying #8 Motion for Judicial Recusal. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Hammersley) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Judge Reassignment by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mac) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(mac) |
| Copy of Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee #5 and Judgment #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert Hammersley (cav) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 12/30/2019. (cc: all counsel)(cav) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting (2) Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee in case 1:19-cv-01853-WCG; granting (2) Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee in case 1:19-cv-01855-WCG. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaints in both actions are DISMISSED forfailure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENTS 21 CD's (20 -pdf files and 1 CD audio files as set forth in cover letter) by Robert Edgar Hammersley re #1 Complaint - Pro Se. (lh) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Robert Edgar Hammersley. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Robert Edgar Hammersley. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Duffin. (20 CD's (pdf files) and 1 CD (audio file) included with complaint) (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(lh) Modified CD text on 12/18/2019 (lh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
