Spatz v. Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc.
| Gregory Spatz |
| Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc. and Experimental Aircraft Association Inc |
| 1:2020cv00614 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to Experimental Aircraft Association Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Gregory Spatz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pledl, Robert) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by All Plaintiffs (Pledl, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc. by Gregory Spatz. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3423905)(Pledl, Robert) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/15/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jcl). |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
