LaPierre-Poff v. Saul
Nicole L LaPierre-Poff |
Andrew M Saul |
1:2020cv00819 |
June 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William C Griesbach |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Jebby Rasputnis (Levitt, David) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Levitt, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Levitt on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: David Levitt (Levitt, David) |
Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 6/8/2020. (lh) |
Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 9/23/2020; Defendants response due 11/2/2020; Plaintiffs reply due 11/17/2020. (cc: all counsel) (lh) |
Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Attorney General of US served on 6/9/2020. (lh) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 6/3/2020 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The clerk shall serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the Commissioner of Social Security. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (Chewning, Donald) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (Chewning, Donald) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LaPierre-Poff v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicole L LaPierre-Poff | |
Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
Represented By: | David Levitt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.