LaPierre-Poff v. Saul
Plaintiff: Nicole L LaPierre-Poff
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv00819
Filed: June 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2020 Filing 12 DECLARATION of Jebby Rasputnis (Levitt, David)
July 31, 2020 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Levitt, David)
July 31, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Levitt on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: David Levitt (Levitt, David)
June 19, 2020 Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 6/8/2020. (lh)
June 15, 2020 Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 9/23/2020; Defendants response due 11/2/2020; Plaintiffs reply due 11/17/2020. (cc: all counsel) (lh)
June 12, 2020 Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Attorney General of US served on 6/9/2020. (lh)
June 4, 2020 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 6/3/2020 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The clerk shall serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the Commissioner of Social Security. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
June 3, 2020 Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac)
June 2, 2020 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald)
June 2, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (Chewning, Donald)
June 2, 2020 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff. (Chewning, Donald)
June 2, 2020 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Nicole L. LaPierre-Poff (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald)
June 2, 2020 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaPierre-Poff v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole L LaPierre-Poff
Represented By: Donald J Chewning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: David Levitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?