Helsinger v. Saul
| 1:2020cv01015 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel)(blr)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/10/2020 GRANTING 6 plaintiff's amended motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/8/2020. By 7/29/2020 plaintiff to file amended request to proceed without prepaying filing fee. Failure to file by deadline will result in denial of motion and requirement that plaintiff pay full filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Helsinger v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
