Desotelle v. Saul
| Cindy Desotelle |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv01283 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 8/31/2020. (blr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/28/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Andrew Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean)
|
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties. By 10/26/2020 defendant to file and serve certified administrative record. Plaintiff's brief due 12/7/2020; defendant's response due 1/18/2021; plaintiff's reply due 2/2/2021. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
|
|
Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (amb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/21/2020 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Cindy Desotelle. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Cindy Desotelle. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE Statement by Cindy Desotelle. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Cindy Desotelle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Desotelle v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Jean Marie Godfrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cindy Desotelle | |
| Represented By: | Dana W Duncan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
