Bickham v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Donald Frederick Bickham |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv01304 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/15/2020. (blr) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/10/2020. (blr) |
| Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 12/21/2020; Defendants response due 2/1/2021; Plaintiffs reply due 2/16/2021. (cc: all counsel) (asc) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/9/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin for all further proceedings. Judge J P Stadtmueller no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Donald Frederick Bickham. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Transmit #1 Complaint and #4 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (amb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 8/28/2020 GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
|
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website. (ds) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Donald Frederick Bickham. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Donald Frederick Bickham. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Donald Frederick Bickham (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bickham v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald Frederick Bickham | |
| Represented By: | Howard D Olinsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
