Rosner v. Saul
| Dale R. Rosner |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 1:2020cv01346 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/22/20 that the defendant file the certified administrative record by December 21, 2020; plaintiff file his opening brief by February 1, 2021; defendant file his response brief by March 15, 2021; and plaintiff file any reply brief by March 30, 2021. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Filing 8 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on September 21, 2020. (amb) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on September 21, 2020. (amb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan C Hugo on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Megan C. Hugo (Hugo, Megan) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (asc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/9/20 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Dale R. Rosner. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Dale R. Rosner. (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Dale R. Rosner (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rosner v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Megan C Hugo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dale R. Rosner | |
| Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
