Holtz v. Oneida Airport Hotel Corporation
| Crystal Holtz |
| Oneida Airport Hotel Corporation doing business as Oneida Radisson Hotel |
| 1:2020cv01360 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 10/16/2020 granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Crystal Holtz) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Crystal Holtz. (Attachments: #1 Order of USCA Transferring Motion to District Court)(mac) |
| Filing 10 USCA Case Number 20-2903 USCA re: #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Crystal Holtz. (lh) |
| Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
| Filing 8 Pro Se Cover Letter re: #7 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Judgment, #5 Order by Crystal Holtz. (cc: all counsel) (mac) |
| Copy of Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA #9 , Pro Se Cover Letter #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Crystal Holtz together with USCA forms (mac) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 9/28/2020. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Holtz)(cav) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 9/28/2020 denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The case is dismissed. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Holtz) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Crystal Holtz. (lh) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Crystal Holtz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from the Clerk to Crystal Holtz requesting that she submit the consent/refusal form for Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries within 21 days. Plaintiff must also submit her request to proceed without prepayment of the fee. (tlf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with jury demand against Oneida Airport Hotel Corporation filed by Crystal Holtz. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Dismissal)(tlf) |
| Copy of "Answers to Pro Se Litigants' Common Questions" mailed to plaintiff on 9/2/2020. (tlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holtz v. Oneida Airport Hotel Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Holtz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oneida Airport Hotel Corporation doing business as Oneida Radisson Hotel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
