Wachholz v. Saul
Plaintiff: Jennifer Wachholz
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv01412
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Referring Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on September 21, 2020. (amb)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on September 21, 2020. (amb)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/18/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties. By 11/16/2020 defendant to file and serve certified administrative record. Plaintiff's brief due 12/28/2020; defendant's response due 2/8/2021; plaintiff's reply due 2/23/2021. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/11/2020 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jennifer Wachholz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jennifer Wachholz. (Duncan, Dana)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Jennifer Wachholz. (Duncan, Dana)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Jennifer Wachholz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wachholz v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Wachholz
Represented By: Dana W Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?