LaValley v. Saul
| Mellody LaValley |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv01432 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| William C Griesbach |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/24/20. (cav)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
|
|
Filing 9
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/22/2020. (tlf)
|
|
Filing 8
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due January 4, 2021; Defendant's response due February 16, 2021; Plaintiff's reply due March 3, 2021. (cc: all counsel) (amb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries for all further proceedings. Judge William C Griesbach no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 9/16/2020 GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
|
Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Mellody LaValley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Mellody LaValley. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE Statement by Mellody LaValley. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Mellody LaValley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LaValley v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Emily Skutch Cohn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mellody LaValley | |
| Represented By: | Dana W Duncan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
