Neubauer v. Integrity Recovery Management, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Tanya Neubauer
Defendant: Samuel Piccione and Integrity Recovery Management, LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv01466
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2020 Filing 8 BRIEF in Support filed by Samuel Piccione re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Little, Brendan)
October 30, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Samuel Piccione. (Little, Brendan)
October 21, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tanya Neubauer. Samuel Piccione served on 10/10/2020. (Greene, Francis)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tanya Neubauer. Integrity Recovery Management, LLC served on 9/29/2020. (Greene, Francis)
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tanya Neubauer. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Greene, Francis)
September 21, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew T Thomasson on behalf of Tanya Neubauer. Attorney(s) appearing: Andrew T. Thomasson (Thomasson, Andrew)
September 21, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Katelyn Busby on behalf of Tanya Neubauer. Attorney(s) appearing: Katelyn B. Busby (Busby, Katelyn)
September 21, 2020 Summons Issued as to Integrity Recovery Management, LLC, Samuel Piccione. (cav)
September 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Integrity Recovery Management, LLC, Samuel Piccione by Tanya Neubauer. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3577225) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Defendant's September 30, 2019 Communication to Plaintiff, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greene, Francis)
September 18, 2020 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neubauer v. Integrity Recovery Management, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Piccione
Represented By: Brendan H Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Integrity Recovery Management, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Neubauer
Represented By: Francis R Greene
Represented By: Katelyn Busby
Represented By: Andrew T Thomasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?