Nelson v. Saul
| Patricia A Nelson |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 1:2020cv01878 |
| December 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/8/21. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries for all further proceedings. Judge Lynn Adelman no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Filing 8
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/31/2020. (blr)
|
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 4/1/21; Defendants response due 5/11/21; Plaintiffs reply due 5/26/21. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/22/20 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Patricia A Nelson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (cmb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Patricia A. Nelson. (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE Statement by Patricia A. Nelson. (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Patricia A. Nelson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nelson v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia A Nelson | |
| Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
