Linsmeier v. Saul
| Nancy M Linsmeier |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 1:2021cv00496 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 6/15/21. Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record, ECF No. #8 , is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to file the administrative record is EXTENDED to August 20, 2021. All other deadlines set forth in the briefing letter, ECF No. #5 , are VACATED and will be re-set when the record is filed. (cc: all counsel) (jh)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Godfrey, Jean)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean)
|
|
Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (blr)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
VACATED pursuant to ECF No. 9 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 6/21/2021;Plaintiff's brief due 8/2/2021;Defendant's response due 9/13/2021;Plaintiff's reply due 9/28/2021. (cc: all counsel) (asc) Modified on 6/15/2021 (blr).
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy M Linsmeier. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nancy M Linsmeier (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE Statement by Nancy M Linsmeier. (Chewning, Donald)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Nancy M Linsmeier ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3795994) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit - ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Linsmeier v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Jean Marie Godfrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nancy M Linsmeier | |
| Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
