Hawk v. Oneida Family Court
Plaintiff: Daniel D Hawk
Defendant: Oneida Court of Appeals and Oneida Family Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00602
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2021 Filing 14 CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) FEE NOTICE of USCA re #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel D Hawk. (mac)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 6/3/2021 denying #12 Motion for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The Court ceritifes the appeal has been taken in BAD FAITH. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
May 28, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Daniel D Hawk. (mac)
May 25, 2021 Filing 11 CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) NOTICE ORDER of USCA re #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel D Hawk. (lh)
May 25, 2021 Filing 10 USCA Case Number 21-1973 USCA re: #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel D Hawk. (lh)
May 24, 2021 Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal (lh)
May 24, 2021 Filing 8 Pro Se Cover Letter re: #7 Notice of Appeal (lh)
May 24, 2021 Filing 7 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order, #6 Judgment by Daniel D Hawk. (cc: all counsel) (lh)
May 24, 2021 Copy of Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA #9 , Pro Se Cover Letter #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Daniel Hawk with forms (lh)
May 20, 2021 Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 5/20/2021. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(lh)
May 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 5/20/2021. The complaint is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's #2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
May 13, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Oneida Court of Appeals, Oneida Family Court filed by Daniel D Hawk.(lh)
May 13, 2021 Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Daniel Hawk re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (lh)
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Daniel D Hawk. (lh)
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Oneida Family Court filed by Daniel D Hawk. (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawk v. Oneida Family Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oneida Court of Appeals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oneida Family Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel D Hawk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?